Wasim Akram: Multiple factors behind Pakistan cricket decline
Former Pakistan cricket star Wasim Akram has spoken out about the national team's recent struggles. In an interview with AFP, he stated that the decline was entirely predictable and stems from a shortage of talent in red-ball cricket.

Former Pakistan cricket captain Wasim Akram has addressed the ongoing decline in Pakistan cricket, pointing to a multitude of underlying issues rather than placing the blame on any single individual or factor. In a recent interview with news agency AFP, the legendary fast bowler shared his candid assessment of the sport's current state within the country, describing the situation as a deeply disappointing turn of events for fans and players alike.
Elaborating on the timeline of these sporting struggles, Wasim Akram revealed that this downward trajectory has not come as a surprise to him. According to the former cricketer, he had actually foreseen such a crisis developing over the course of the past five years. Because the challenges are so deeply rooted, he emphasized that it is unfair and inaccurate to pin the entire responsibility on just one person or a solitary issue.
Addressing the core technical and structural problems facing the team, the cricket icon highlighted a specific vulnerability within the traditional format of the game. He stated clearly that Pakistan currently suffers from a notable lack of sufficient talent in red-ball cricket. At the same time, he noted that the limited-overs white-ball squad is performing in a relatively acceptable and satisfactory manner.
Turning his attention to the governing body, Wasim Akram discussed the frequent tendency to target the leadership during difficult periods. He pointed out that while it is always easy to shift the blame directly onto the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman, such simplistic reactions overlook the broader systemic failures that have plagued the national setup for a prolonged period.
Concluding his detailed remarks to AFP, the former captain delivered a stark assessment of the collective inaction that preceded the current crisis. He argued that the team's eventual descent was a completely natural consequence of institutional negligence. In his view, the stakeholders simply remained asleep at the wheel while the underlying problems continued to compound without any serious or concerted effort to resolve them.






